Linux ATA/IDE development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Impact of no_lba48{_dma} = 1 ?
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:03:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45C9DC1B.2070602@imc-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070207141149.5c0c709b@localhost.localdomain>

Alan wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:49:44 +0300
> Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello.
>>
>> Alan wrote:
>>
>>>>> Only relevant for DMA really
>>>> So rqsize is only needed for DMA accesses?
>>     Not really, it affects both PIO and DMA.
> 
> Yes but its not relevant. The question was about performance, and your
> performance will suck equally with PIO regardless of the request size
> limit.

Ok: I rephrase my question:

Could it be that my HDD behaves strangly (i.e. doing

	hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
	ide: failed opcode was: unknown
	hda: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
	ide0: unexpected interrupt, status=0x80, count=1
	ide0: reset: success

) sometimes when rqsize is set to 65536 altough I only do PIO transfer?

Steven

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-07 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-07  9:56 Impact of no_lba48{_dma} = 1 ? Steven Scholz
2007-02-07 11:58 ` Alan
2007-02-07 13:25   ` Steven Scholz
2007-02-07 13:53     ` Alan
2007-02-07 13:49       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-02-07 14:11         ` Alan
2007-02-07 14:03           ` Steven Scholz [this message]
2007-02-07 14:19             ` Alan
2007-02-07 14:10           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-02-07 13:57       ` Steven Scholz
2007-02-07 14:09         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-02-07 14:16         ` Alan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45C9DC1B.2070602@imc-berlin.de \
    --to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox