From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH] (pata-2.6 fix queue) cmd64x: remove broken SW/MW DMA support Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:06:12 +0300 Message-ID: <45D5C864.80009@ru.mvista.com> References: <200702080858.l188wjmG008432@harpo.it.uu.se> <45D5AD8B.1060702@ru.mvista.com> <45D5B420.7040509@ru.mvista.com> <200702161542.16883.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:51254 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932415AbXBPPGX (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:06:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200702161542.16883.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Mikael Pettersson , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox Hello. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>> The intent of the patch was exactly to *remove* broken DMA support >>>until it's fixed (which requires more work). It only worked by chance >>>-- because MWDMA2 timings are the same as of PIO4. Have patience please. >> You may also consider switching to the libata driver -- Alan said he fixed >>DMA support there after I frisrt reported the breakage (however, I' still not >>seeing it fixed in the mainline)... > I've just checked 2.6.20-mm1 (contains libata tree) and it is not fixed. I was saying exatly that. So, that's a question to Alan. :-) > Bart WBR, Sergei