From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv: complain on spurious completion notifiers Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 05:37:54 -0500 Message-ID: <45DEC402.4030205@garzik.org> References: <45DD2FBF.1040808@shaw.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:44931 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932213AbXBWKh4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 05:37:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <45DD2FBF.1040808@shaw.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Robert Hancock Cc: linux-kernel , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo Robert Hancock wrote: > Recently Tejun wrote a patch to ahci.c to make it raise a HSM violation > if the drive attempted to complete a tag that wasn't outstanding. We could > run into the same problem with sata_nv ADMA. This adds code to raise a HSM > violation error if the controller gives us a notifier tag that isn't > outstanding, since the drive may be issuing spurious completions. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock applied