From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] ahci: improve spurious SDB FIS handling Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:20:02 -0500 Message-ID: <45E77BC2.3060400@garzik.org> References: <20070227042419.GG20322@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:46276 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422673AbXCBBUE (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:20:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20070227042419.GG20322@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > Spurious SDB FIS during NCQ might not contain spurious completions. > It could be spurious TF update or invalid async notification. Treat > as HSM violation iff a spurious SDB FIS contains spurious completions; > otherwise, just whine once about it. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo applied