From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATA] Failed to set xfermode on LITE-ON LTR-48246S Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:50:07 +0900 Message-ID: <45F157FF.50801@gmail.com> References: <20070227135838.GA4328@titan.lahn.de> <45EB9822.40300@gmail.com> <20070305103840.GA4381@titan.lahn.de> <45EC3B3F.7020509@gmail.com> <20070306092339.GA3803@titan.lahn.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.238]:5114 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767228AbXCIMuJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:50:09 -0500 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so760363nze for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 04:50:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20070306092339.GA3803@titan.lahn.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: > Hello Tejun! > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:07AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:10:10PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >>>> * Does applying the attached patch over unpatched 2.6.20.1 fix the problem? >>> Yes, it seems to fix it. (testes on top of the first patch mentioned >>> above, but witheout the second one.). >>> If I should test it as the sole patche, just mail me again please. >> Yeap, please test it on top of vanilla kernel to verify that the patch >> proper fixes the problem. > > Yes, applying only this patch does fix the problem. > Thank you for your support. Okay, it seems we'll have to default to polling SETXFER. I'll forward it upstream soon. Thanks. -- tejun