From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Adaptec 1220SA (Sil3132) & sata_sil24 question Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 02:26:39 +0900 Message-ID: <45F58D4F.5030408@gmail.com> References: <45E65540.6090308@metaparadigm.com> <45F533F8.3050401@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.230]:34630 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750827AbXCLR0j (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:26:39 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so1741590wxd for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:26:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <45F533F8.3050401@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: James Clark Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > James Clark wrote: >> I have an Adaptec 1220SA which I originally thought was just a re-badged >> Sil3132 design. Externally it appears that way (the stamp on the chip >> reads 3132), however it identifies as a Silicon Image type 0x0242 >> according to lspci. sata_sil24 does not attach. >> >> I made the trivial addition to sata_sil24 device id table and it appears >> to work. Performance is about the same as I get with the same drives on >> the onboard sata_via (about 78MB/s sequential read, 72MB/s write) and >> md mirror resyncing reflects this. > > I'll ask SIMG about it. Okay, SIMG verified it. Can you please post the patch with proper subject, description and Signed-off-by? The following is a good example. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/16956 Anything from --- to the start of the patch is optional (including --- itself). Thanks. -- tejun