From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] PCI prepare/activate instead of enable to avoid IRQ storm and rogue DMA access Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:16:47 -0400 Message-ID: <45F8825F.3030904@garzik.org> References: <20070314152302.GB15600@htj.dyndns.org> <20070314215605.GA7194@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <45F87863.9040408@garzik.org> <20070314225818.GB7194@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:45285 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964790AbXCNXQw (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:16:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070314225818.GB7194@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik , Tejun Heo , gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, mlord@pobox.com, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org Russell King wrote: > In any case, relying on such a new control bit to implement this kind > of functionality would result in a very hit and miss result; Linux How does Tejun's patch or thesis rely on this new control bit? He explicitly mentions DISABLE_INTX variability... Jeff