From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] sl82c105: add ->speedproc support Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:40:18 +0300 Message-ID: <45F98502.50509@ru.mvista.com> References: <45F86058.6090509@ru.mvista.com> <45F956B4.1060309@xandros.com> <20070315173633.GA26160@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:26596 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932223AbXCORkd (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:40:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070315173633.GA26160@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King Cc: Woody Suwalski , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. Russell King wrote: >>> I wonder is there are some W83C554 users anywhere -- that chipset >>>also supports UltraDMA... >>Sergei, >>ARM Netwinder machines are running hard disk IDE on SL82c105. >>Could you send me the actual source file to try (or a patch)? > That's actually a W83C553 which does not support UDMA in any shape or > form according to the documents. > I guess it's an enhancement found on W83C554, and in that case any > attempt to add UDMA support to the SL82C105 driver should be done > such that these older chipsets continue to work. I had no plans of adding it so far since there seemed to be no designs using that chip but decided to ask if somebody is interested just in case... MBR, Sergei