From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Subject: ATA ACPI (was Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc5)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:51:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4608B0CA.1040005@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703251559560.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> There's various fixes here, ranging from some architecture updates (ia64,
> ARM, MIPS, SH, Sparc64) to KVM, networking and network drivers.
>
> And random one-liners.
>
> But probably more important, and likely much more visible to most people
> is the fixes for the fallout from the hrtimers and no-HZ changes, and some
> of the ACPI regressions.
>
> Those timer changes ended up much more painful than anybody wished for,
> but big thanks to Thomas Gleixner for being on it like a weasel on a dead
> rat, and the regression list has kept shrinking.
>
> So if you have reported a regression in the 2.6.21-rc series, please check
> 2.6.21-rc5, and update your report as appropriate (whether fixed or "still
> problems with xyzzy").
>
> Linus
[just got back from vacation, or would have sent this earlier]
FWIW, I'm still leaning towards disabling libata ACPI support by default
for 2.6.21.
Upstream has Alan's fix for the worst PATA problems, but for different
reasons, I think PATA ACPI and SATA ACPI support in libata does not feel
quite ready for prime time in 2.6.21.
Scream now, or hold your peace until 2.6.22... :)
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-27 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703251559560.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2007-03-27 1:59 ` [2/5] 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions Adrian Bunk
2007-03-28 19:46 ` Laurent Riffard
2007-03-29 19:02 ` Fabio Comolli
2007-03-27 1:59 ` [4/5] " Adrian Bunk
2007-03-27 5:51 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-03-27 5:54 ` ATA ACPI (was Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc5) Tejun Heo
2007-03-27 21:32 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-28 9:51 ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-27 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-27 18:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-30 21:32 ` [1/4] 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions (v2) Adrian Bunk
2007-03-30 21:38 ` Greg KH
2007-03-31 0:23 ` Michal Jaegermann
2007-03-31 15:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-31 16:42 ` Michal Jaegermann
2007-03-30 21:32 ` [3/4] " Adrian Bunk
2007-03-31 2:52 ` Jeff Chua
2007-03-31 18:19 ` 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions with patches (v2) Adrian Bunk
2007-04-03 4:05 ` [PATCH] libata: add NCQ blacklist entries from Silicon Image Windows driver (v2) Robert Hancock
2007-04-03 4:13 ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-04 6:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-04 14:26 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4608B0CA.1040005@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=kristen.c.accardi@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).