From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: ATA ACPI (was Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc5)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:51:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <460A3A89.2050809@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070327213200.GA5842@ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>>> So if you have reported a regression in the 2.6.21-rc
>>>> series, please check 2.6.21-rc5, and update your
>>>> report as appropriate (whether fixed or "still
>>>> problems with xyzzy").
>>> [just got back from vacation, or would have sent this
>>> earlier]
>>>
>>> FWIW, I'm still leaning towards disabling libata ACPI
>>> support by default for 2.6.21.
>>>
>>> Upstream has Alan's fix for the worst PATA problems,
>>> but for different reasons, I think PATA ACPI and SATA
>>> ACPI support in libata does not feel quite ready for
>>> prime time in 2.6.21.
>>>
>>> Scream now, or hold your peace until 2.6.22... :)
>> I second disabling ACPI for 2.6.21.
>
> Ugh.. does that mean we'll have 'regression reports' as in 'it worked
> ok in -rc5, broken in final?
>
> Well, suspend is currently so broken that we'll be flooded by reports,
> anyway, but.... could we get at least define in code so that we can
> tell users to flip it?
Just the default value for libata.noacpi is changed to 1, so user can
easily reenable it by passing boot/module parameter.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-28 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703251559560.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2007-03-27 1:59 ` [2/5] 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions Adrian Bunk
2007-03-28 19:46 ` Laurent Riffard
2007-03-29 19:02 ` Fabio Comolli
2007-03-27 1:59 ` [4/5] " Adrian Bunk
2007-03-27 5:51 ` ATA ACPI (was Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc5) Jeff Garzik
2007-03-27 5:54 ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-27 21:32 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-28 9:51 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-03-27 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-27 18:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-30 21:32 ` [1/4] 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions (v2) Adrian Bunk
2007-03-30 21:38 ` Greg KH
2007-03-31 0:23 ` Michal Jaegermann
2007-03-31 15:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-31 16:42 ` Michal Jaegermann
2007-03-30 21:32 ` [3/4] " Adrian Bunk
2007-03-31 2:52 ` Jeff Chua
2007-03-31 18:19 ` 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions with patches (v2) Adrian Bunk
2007-04-03 4:05 ` [PATCH] libata: add NCQ blacklist entries from Silicon Image Windows driver (v2) Robert Hancock
2007-04-03 4:13 ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-04 6:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-04 14:26 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=460A3A89.2050809@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=kristen.c.accardi@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).