From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] HPA support: Revised patch Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:30:08 -0400 Message-ID: <46155C50.8000003@garzik.org> References: <20070405141352.12fddb6e@the-village.bc.nu> <20070405192421.GB5131@lug-owl.de> <20070405211804.1f64e515@the-village.bc.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070405211804.1f64e515@the-village.bc.nu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Jan-Benedict Glaw , akpm@osdl.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyle@canonical.com List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: >>> +static int ata_ignore_hpa = 0; >>> +module_param_named(ignore_hpa, ata_ignore_hpa, int, 0644); >>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_hpa, "Ignore HPA (0=off 1=on)"); >>> + >>> static int ata_probe_timeout = ATA_TMOUT_INTERNAL / HZ; >>> module_param(ata_probe_timeout, int, 0444); >>> MODULE_PARM_DESC(ata_probe_timeout, "Set ATA probing timeout (seconds)"); >> For ignore_hpa, it would be nice to not go through inverse logic and >> fix the help text a bit (0=honor HPA, 1=ignore HPA). > > Umm.. how about "preserve_hpa" ? I think he meant fix the help text? Regardless, it should be "ignore_hpa" as you have it now, though I feel the help text requires additional human brain parsing, and could be more clear. Jeff