linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: implement and use DMA mask configuration helper
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:20:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <461A055E.2050506@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4619FDA7.10007@garzik.org>

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Jeff, there are further problems with doing pci_go_64() only on devices
>> which support 64bit.  pci_set_dma_mask() is the only place where the PCI
>> code can test whether DMA is usable or not, so if we don't configure DMA
>> mask on 32bit controllers, there's no way to tell whether DMA is allowed
>> on the controller/bus or not.  We end up blindly enabling bus mastering
>> without consulting the PCI bus.
>>
>> I think it's just cleaner to do pci_configure_dma_masks() on all cases
>> with proper DMA mask.
> 
> 
> There is always a cleaner solution :)
> 
> My implementation is based on current practice for all 64-bit drivers.
> 
> If you wish to change current practice, that is another matter...

The thing is that in the current implementation, we do the following.

1. For 32bit devices, we do set_dma/set_persistent to set 32bit masks
manually.

2. For 64bit devices, we do set_dma/set_persistent to set 64bit masks
but falls back to 32bit.  This is sometimes done manually sometimes
using a helper (pci_go_64).

This patch tries to do #1 and #2 in the same way and the end result
doesn't change - we're just using the same helper function instead of
doing things directly for both 32bit and 64bit cases.  Are you
suggesting to just generalize pci_go_64 and leave 32bit cases as they are?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-09  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-09 10:49 [PATCH] libata: implement and use DMA mask configuration helper Tejun Heo
2007-03-09 12:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-09 13:03   ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-18 14:48   ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-18 17:47     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-18 17:54       ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-09  7:35       ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-09  8:47         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-09  9:20           ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-03-09 12:51 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=461A055E.2050506@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).