From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] ahci.c: remove non-existing SB600 raid id Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:16:36 +0900 Message-ID: <461CB584.1050309@gmail.com> References: <5767b9100704110254s16566ce7n147aa578181d84e6@mail.gmail.com> <461CB1B1.9030207@gmail.com> <5767b9100704110312t3ce53bd6u1dbb50c79eeb8d7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.239]:49346 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752022AbXDKKQn (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:16:43 -0400 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so87868nze for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:16:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5767b9100704110312t3ce53bd6u1dbb50c79eeb8d7@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Conke Hu Cc: Jeff Garzik , Alan , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Conke Hu wrote: > On 4/11/07, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Conke Hu wrote: >> > SB600 RAID and SB600 SATA is the same controller and share the >> > same PCI ID 0x4380. There is such PCI ID 0x4381. >> >> I assume 'no' is missing in the last sentence. :-) >> >> -- >> tejun >> > > Oh, sorry :( > so, should I re-send the mail? It isn't my call but I think it's okay. I just couldn't resist the bait. :-) -- tejun