From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: [PATCH pata-2.6] cmd64x: procfs code fixes/cleanups (take 2) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:18:47 -0400 Message-ID: <46215347.2000403@rtr.ca> References: <200704142011.l3EKBBhf025590@harpo.it.uu.se> <462136AF.9060505@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ottawa-hs-64-26-128-89.s-ip.magma.ca ([64.26.128.89]:2990 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751564AbXDNWSu (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:18:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <462136AF.9060505@ru.mvista.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Mikael Pettersson , bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >>> - correct the chipset names (from CMDxxx to PCI-xxx) > >> Please explain why this rename is a correction. > > Because the chips are officially named PCI064[036] and PCI-64[89]. We normally name things with a combination of brand and chip number. Lots of companies could have chips with PCI in the name, but the CMD64x designator makes it quite clear what we're dealing with here. In the machines I have here with these chips, they are clearly labelled as "CMD" and then "PCI646.." -ml