From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] libata: implement libata.spindown_compat Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:20:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4624E5D8.6080806@garzik.org> References: <20070320150718.GF6152@htj.dyndns.org> <20070320151359.GG6152@htj.dyndns.org> <20070320152533.GH6152@htj.dyndns.org> <20070320155548.GI6152@htj.dyndns.org> <4624DD95.3070608@garzik.org> <1176822118.3671.32.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:40144 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754461AbXDQPVA (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:21:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1176822118.3671.32.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, djwong@us.ibm.com, hmh@hmh.eng.br James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 10:45 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> ACK patches 3-4 for upstream. I'm dropping them, and requesting resend >> when patches 1-2 are applied (which I also ACK). Or, alternately, I >> could apply all four patches with the other subsystem owner's assent, or >> the other subsystem owner could apply all four patches now that I have >> ACK'd them. Pick any of the three options. :) > > I've got 1 and 2 upstream to -mm via scsi-misc-2.6 already. > Unfortunately they're not simply separable since there's a bad > interaction with the sd messages rework that's also in scsi-misc. then, unless there are dependencies in libata-dev, how about Tejun pushes patches 3-4 through scsi-misc as well?