From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] libata: implement libata.spindown_compat Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:09:47 +0900 Message-ID: <4624FF5B.9010000@gmail.com> References: <20070320150718.GF6152@htj.dyndns.org> <20070320151359.GG6152@htj.dyndns.org> <20070320152533.GH6152@htj.dyndns.org> <20070320155548.GI6152@htj.dyndns.org> <4624DD95.3070608@garzik.org> <1176822118.3671.32.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <4624E5D8.6080806@garzik.org> <1176823590.3671.35.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1176823590.3671.35.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, djwong@us.ibm.com, hmh@hmh.eng.br List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 11:20 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> then, unless there are dependencies in libata-dev, how about Tejun >> pushes patches 3-4 through scsi-misc as well? > > Sure ... as long as there are no dependencies. James, are you going to rebase scsi-misc-2.6 before sending to Linus when 2.6.22-rc1 window opens? If not, Jeff can pull it into libata-dev and patch 3 and 4 can go in there. The difference in libata between scsi-misc-2.6 and libata-dev is rather large and applying 3 and 4 to scsi-misc-2.6 would cause merging headache later. Thanks. -- tejun