From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chuck Ebbert Subject: Re: Loud "pop" coming from hard drive on reboot Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:27:49 -0400 Message-ID: <462D40F5.5050704@redhat.com> References: <88SeR-5Sf-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <46265307.7060405@rtr.ca> <46265966.1040102@redhat.com> <200704182322.20514.bzolnier@gmail.com> <46268D27.9070809@redhat.com> <1177197606.7316.44.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:34266 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752960AbXDWXaY (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:30:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1177197606.7316.44.camel@twins> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Mark Lord , Stephen.Clark@seclark.us, Tejun Heo , Alan Cox , 7eggert@gmx.de, emisca , Jan Engelhardt , linux-kernel , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > but I have an increasing seek error rate as well. I got the ST disk > because thinkwiki suggested it. > Apparently Seagate has their own definition of seek error rate. Large numbers are normal, or at least very common. Now I wonder if they have their own way of doing retract count...