From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Subject: Re: libata fails to recover from HSM violation involving DRQ status
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:41:01 -0400
Message-ID: <4633BF6D.40902@rtr.ca>
References: <4633AB75.7070107@rtr.ca>	<4633B0A6.6090705@garzik.org> <20070428222502.26fc9bbc@the-village.bc.nu> <4633BEE7.8020005@garzik.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:2374 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1030926AbXD1VlF (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:41:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4633BEE7.8020005@garzik.org>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>, IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> It's not really a good idea for SATA.  The "FIFO" often co-emulated by 
> the SATA controller and SATA phy.  You just want to kick SATA really 
> hard (i.e. bus reset and friends).

Sure.  So why don't we do that now?