From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Recent ipr breakage (ata_do_eh api change) Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 11:21:57 -0400 Message-ID: <463B4F95.5080307@pobox.com> References: <463B4DF4.70908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:48780 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933084AbXEDPWP (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 11:22:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <463B4DF4.70908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Brian King Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Tejun Heo , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , thlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com Brian King wrote: > This looks like a fix for a compile problem with the libata-all > branch. I did some poking around and it looks like the ata_do_eh > api change is in Jeff's #all branch, but not in #upstream, so > I am assuming the ipr patch mentioned above should be reverted > in mainline for now. At the moment, there is no #upstream branch. It's all, um, upstream :) What you see in #ALL is the combination of #reset-seq and #mv-ahci branches. Jeff