From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [patch] Add the device IDs for AMD/ATI SB700 Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 15:09:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4641C80D.7020108@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.182]:43676 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755679AbXEINKI (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 09:10:08 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so151415pyi for ; Wed, 09 May 2007 06:10:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Henry Su Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, greg@kroah.com, bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, xiaosuzi520@hotmail.com Henry Su wrote: > --- linux-2.6.21.1.orig/drivers/ide/pci/atiixp.c 2007-05-10 06:30:17.000000000 +0800 > +++ linux-2.6.21.1/drivers/ide/pci/atiixp.c 2007-05-10 07:18:39.000000000 +0800 > @@ -353,6 +353,7 @@ static struct pci_device_id atiixp_pci_t > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP300_IDE, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP400_IDE, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP600_IDE, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 1}, > + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP700_IDE, PCI_ANY_ID, > +PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 1}, > { 0, }, > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, atiixp_pci_tbl); > > --- linux-2.6.21.1.orig/drivers/ata/ahci.c 2007-05-10 06:30:14.000000000 +0800 > +++ linux-2.6.21.1/drivers/ata/ahci.c 2007-05-10 07:41:41.000000000 +0800 > @@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ahci_p > /* ATI */ > { PCI_VDEVICE(ATI, 0x4380), board_ahci_sb600 }, /* ATI SB600 non-raid */ > { PCI_VDEVICE(ATI, 0x4381), board_ahci }, /* ATI SB600 raid */ Wasn't there a patch which dropped SB600 raid entry? I think I heard there's no device which has 0x4381 as its DID. -- tejun