From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libata reset-seq merge broke sata_sil on sh
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:28:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464301D3.5060306@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070510072005.GA27316@linux-sh.org>
Hello,
Paul Mundt wrote:
[--snip, thanks a lot for the detailed report--]
> However, if I go back before any of the reset changes were introduced,
> things were working fine, and there were no problems with waiting for
> the reset. Ideas?
Hmm... It worked so well on all my sil's. I'm a bit puzzled because we
also failed the same condition before the change too. The only change
is we're less patient with the initial tries but in the end we give more
than enough time to the device to prepare itself.
* Does your drive start spun down when it boots? Can you post dmesg
with printk timestamp turned on with kernel prior to reset-seq merge?
* In ata_bus_softreset() and sata_std_hardreset(), there's msleep(150)
delay before checking the status post-reset. Does increasing the delay
make any difference? Please try to increase it exponentially till it
reaches 10sec.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-10 7:20 libata reset-seq merge broke sata_sil on sh Paul Mundt
2007-05-10 11:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-05-10 11:53 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-10 12:46 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-10 13:08 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-11 0:52 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-11 9:39 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-12 3:49 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-16 0:30 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-16 16:44 ` [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset() Tejun Heo
2007-05-17 0:50 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-17 0:59 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-19 15:54 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 18:23 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 22:54 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 9:50 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 13:26 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 17:09 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 19:35 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 16:39 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 18:43 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 19:04 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 22:33 ` sd_resume redundant? [was: [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset()] Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 9:54 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 14:27 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 17:17 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 19:47 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-21 6:02 ` [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset() Paul Mundt
2007-05-29 1:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-29 7:33 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464301D3.5060306@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).