From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [patch 05/20] pata_acpi-restore-driver versus libata-clean-up-sff-init-mess Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:43:27 +0200 Message-ID: <464456DF.5010506@gmail.com> References: <200705110548.l4B5mlAh007627@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183]:47725 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758084AbXEKLni (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 07:43:38 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so761023pyi for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 04:43:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200705110548.l4B5mlAh007627@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > From: Andrew Morton > > If you apply both libata-clean-up-sff-init-mess.patch and > pata_acpi-restore-driver.patch, you'll need to add this patch to > pata_acpi-restore-driver.patch > > Cc: Tejun Heo > Cc: Alan Cox > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Patch looks good to me. It depends on how Jeff decides on libata-clean-up-sff-init-mess tho. -- tejun