From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, forrest.zhao@gmail.com,
lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] libata-acpi: s/CONFIG_SATA_ACPI/CONFIG_ATA_ACPI/
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:13:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4644EA70.9020700@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11783766382010-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> ACPI applies to both SATA and PATA. Drop the 'S' from the config
> variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/Kconfig | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/ata/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/ata/libata.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/libata.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
applied 3-4
the code has been stirred, so I request resend of the other patches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-11 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-05 14:50 [PATCHSET] libata: improve ATA ACPI support, take#2 Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 01/11] libata: separate out ata_dev_reread_id() Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 05/11] libata-acpi: add ATA_FLAG_ACPI_SATA port flag Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 04/11] libata-acpi: clean up parameters and misc stuff Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 06/11] libata-acpi: implement ata_acpi_associate() Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 02/11] libata: during revalidation, check n_sectors after device is configured Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 03/11] libata-acpi: s/CONFIG_SATA_ACPI/CONFIG_ATA_ACPI/ Tejun Heo
2007-05-11 22:13 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 08/11] libata-acpi: miscellaneous cleanups Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 09/11] libata: reimplement ACPI invocation Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 07/11] libata-acpi: clean up ata_acpi_exec_tfs() Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 11/11] libata-acpi: implement _GTM/_STM support Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 10/11] libata-acpi: remove redundant checks Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4644EA70.9020700@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=forrest.zhao@gmail.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).