linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linux IDE <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	Doug Maxey <dwm@maxeymade.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] libata: ack unsolicited INTRQ when polling
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:20:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <464AB0B7.4000803@tw.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464AACDF.1030903@tw.ibm.com>

patch 5/8:

- Move the ATA_TFLAG_POLLING check from ata_interrupt to ata_host_intr
- Ack unsolicited INTRQ if polling and before the HSM accessing the port.
  (e.g. some device asserts INTRQ even if polling and nIEN = 1.)

Signed-off-by: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
1.
This fixes the Benq "irq nobody cared" problem.
 (Some device asserts INTRQ even if nIEN = 1 and polling.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8441)

Other unsolicited irqs that Alan concerned about will be address in patch 8/8.

2. Per Tejun's advice, I have checked the LLDDs.
The following LLDDs checks ATA_TFLAG_POLLING in their interrupt handler:
  pdc_adma, sata_inic162x, sata_mv, sata_nv, sata_promise,
  sata_qstor, sata_sil, sata_sx4 and sata_vsc.
After review, it seems non of them requires change due to this patch.

BTW, sata_sil and some other LLDDs already have such workaround in it.

diff -Nrup 04_move_narrow_lock/drivers/ata/libata-core.c 05_polling_ack/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
--- 04_move_narrow_lock/drivers/ata/libata-core.c	2007-05-16 13:53:16.000000000 +0800
+++ 05_polling_ack/drivers/ata/libata-core.c	2007-05-16 13:53:20.000000000 +0800
@@ -5694,6 +5694,13 @@ inline unsigned int ata_host_intr (struc
 	if (ap->pflags & ATA_PFLAG_HSM_WQ)
 		goto idle_irq;
 
+	/* polling, while HSM not yet active in wq */
+	if (qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_POLLING) {
+		/* ack unsolicited irq */
+		ata_chk_status(ap);
+		goto idle_irq;
+	}
+
 	/* Check whether we are expecting interrupt in this state */
 	switch (ap->hsm_task_state) {
 	case HSM_ST_FIRST:
@@ -5804,8 +5811,7 @@ irqreturn_t ata_interrupt (int irq, void
 			struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
 
 			qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, ap->active_tag);
-			if (qc && (!(qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_POLLING)) &&
-			    (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE))
+			if (qc && (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE))
 				handled |= ata_host_intr(ap, qc);
 		}
 	}



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-16  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-16  7:03 [PATCH/RFC 0/8] libata: delegate irq driven pio to workqueue (take 2) Albert Lee
2007-05-16  7:09 ` [PATCH 1/8] libata: fix the ata_altstatus() in ata_hsm_qc_complete() Albert Lee
2007-05-16  7:11 ` [PATCH 2/8] libata: move ata_altstatus() out from ata_hsm_move() to the pio data xfer functions Albert Lee
2007-05-16  7:13 ` [PATCH 3/8] libata: change the state after "PIO data-in" to HSM_ST_IDLE instead of HSM_ST_LAST Albert Lee
2007-05-16  7:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] libata: move and reduce locking to the pio data xfer functions Albert Lee
2007-05-16  7:20 ` Albert Lee [this message]
2007-05-16  7:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] libata: delegate irq driven pio to workqueue Albert Lee
2007-05-16  7:24 ` [PATCH 7/8] libata: fix ata_port_flush_task() for irq pio delegation Albert Lee
2007-05-16  7:29 ` [PATCH 8/8] libata: ack more unsolicited INTRQ Albert Lee
2007-05-16 13:02   ` Alan Cox
2007-05-17  8:59     ` Albert Lee
2007-05-17  9:25       ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-17 15:42         ` Mark Lord
2007-05-17 15:50           ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-17 16:00           ` Alan Cox
2007-05-17  9:28       ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=464AB0B7.4000803@tw.ibm.com \
    --to=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=albertl@mail.com \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwm@maxeymade.com \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).