From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Chmielewski Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: new exception handling (hotplug, NCQ framework) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 13:47:53 +0200 Message-ID: <464EE3E9.80708@wpkg.org> References: <20070519054201.GA32686@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.syneticon.net ([213.239.212.131]:48996 "EHLO mail2.syneticon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763842AbXESLsh (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2007 07:48:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070519054201.GA32686@havoc.gtf.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML Jeff Garzik schrieb: > Below is a refresh of my on-going effort to convert sata_mv to the new > exception handling framework. sata_mv is one of the last hold-outs, and > its old-EH implementation blocks new features like hotplug and NCQ. > > It works for me on the one 50xx and one 60xx card I tested it on, but > other testers reported regressions, which is why it is not yet upstream. Hi, If I'm correct, this patch won't make to 2.6.22, and the first possible inclusion would be 2.6.23? Could you summarize what other regressions were reported? I can't find much information about sata_mv regressiobs on linux-ide list (at least when looking at the subjects: lots of patches from you, and two reports from me). -- Tomasz Chmielewski