linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Florian Effenberger <florian@effenberger.org>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libata interface fatal error
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:21:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46559F5B.4090700@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46559C62.2040509@effenberger.org>

Florian Effenberger wrote:
>> Looks like a genuine transmission/interface error to me.  How often does
>> this occur?  Please try to connect the drive to another port using and
>> possibly different power lane.  Also, testing with another drive is a
>> good way to track down where the problem is.
> 
> it occurs as soon as the drive is being used heavily (load of about 2,x
> on the machine when running our test scripts). About 15 times in 2 or 3
> hours. Will try to change port, power supply and drive.
> 
>> Yeah, libata EH is working properly so there shouldn't be any problem
>> other than the error messages and a bit slower transfer speed.
> 
> So, even if the errors are still there, there is nothing real to worry
> about for me?

Data integrity wise there should be no problem but your error rate is
pretty high and eventually will make libata turn off NCQ and/or speed
down PHY speed.

> There are now new errors with hard errors, is this still ok?
> 
> ===
> ata4.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
> ata4.00: cmd 60/80:00:00:09:97/00:00:0a:00:00/40 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
> 65536 in
>          res 40/00:04:00:67:14/00:00:1c:00:00/40 Emask 0x4 (timeout)

Yeap, your data is safe.  With timeouts, data transfer speed can be much
lower tho.  It definitely seems something is wrong with your hardware setup.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-24 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-24 13:25 libata interface fatal error Florian Effenberger
2007-05-24 13:45 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-24 14:08   ` Florian Effenberger
2007-05-24 14:21     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-05-24 14:47       ` Florian Effenberger
2007-05-24 14:53         ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-24 15:28           ` Florian Effenberger
2007-05-24 14:55         ` Greg Freemyer
2007-05-24 14:59           ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-24 15:00           ` Florian Effenberger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-26  9:43 Florian Effenberger
2007-05-29  9:16 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-29 14:16   ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-06 21:23   ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-07  9:50     ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-07 14:08       ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-13 10:37       ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-14  9:43         ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-14 11:12           ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-14 12:25             ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-14 15:12               ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-18  3:10                 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-18  6:08                   ` Tomi Orava
2007-06-18  6:28                     ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-18 10:38                   ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-18 10:44                     ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-16 10:23       ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-18  3:13         ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-18 10:44           ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-18 10:56             ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-18 11:28               ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-18 11:30                 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-18 11:32                   ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-24 11:32               ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-25  2:49                 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-25  8:47                   ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-18  7:05 Mikael Pettersson
2007-06-18  7:13 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-18 10:47   ` Florian Effenberger
2007-06-18 17:14 ` Ansgar Knappheide
2007-06-18 18:54 ` Tomi Orava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46559F5B.4090700@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=florian@effenberger.org \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).