From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Add MMIO support to pata_sil680 Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:56:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4655FBF5.5080707@rtr.ca> References: <20070515061239.611A2DDEE9@ozlabs.org> <1179209697.32247.153.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070523144217.5abd9fdf@the-village.bc.nu> <1179960518.32247.948.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070524003123.77b9c81c@the-village.bc.nu> <46552A63.4080002@pobox.com> <20070524093316.GB10777@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <4655611E.6050805@garzik.org> <1180001330.32247.1058.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([64.26.128.89]:1768 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750841AbXEXU4X (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 16:56:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1180001330.32247.1058.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Jeff Garzik , Alan Cox , Alan Cox , Linux IDE Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > The only thing that I'm wondering about a bit is that ata_pause so far > uses read of altstatus which _is_ a taskfile register. It's my > understanding that we should avoid doing so in that case. Technically, altstatus is in the control block rather than the command block, so it doesn't really always behave the same as the regular "taskfile" regs. Cheers