From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Unify dma blacklist in ide-dma.c and libata-core.c Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 12:39:29 -0400 Message-ID: <465862C1.6040006@tmr.com> References: <20070521145042.GA6957@redhat.com> <20070521171551.0f81a0be@the-village.bc.nu> <7v3b1pbgeo.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vveela1lv.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.tmr.com ([64.65.253.246]:47769 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753055AbXEZQhC (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2007 12:37:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7vveela1lv.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Alan Cox , Linux Kernel , bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones Junio C Hamano wrote: > This introduces a shared header file that defines the entries > for two dma blacklists in ide-dma.c and libata-core.c to make it > easier to keep them in sync. > Why wasn't this done this way in the first place? Out of tree development for libata or something? -- Bill Davidsen "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot