From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset() Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 21:31:35 -0400 Message-ID: <465B8277.9010001@garzik.org> References: <20070510072005.GA27316@linux-sh.org> <464301D3.5060306@gmail.com> <464307CC.40701@gmail.com> <20070510072005.GA27316@linux-sh.org> <464301D3.5060306@gmail.com> <20070510124645.GA18534@linux-sh.org> <4643196B.7070806@gmail.com> <20070511005217.GA23186@linux-sh.org> <464439C8.7090309@gmail.com> <20070512034928.GB29259@linux-sh.org> <20070516003002.GA18863@linux-sh.org> <464B3505.20004@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:49545 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753122AbXE2Bbm (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 21:31:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <464B3505.20004@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Paul Mundt , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, garyhade@us.ibm.com Tejun Heo wrote: > - msleep(150); > + /* wait a while before checking status */ > + ata_wait_after_reset(ap, deadline); [...] > - msleep(150); > + /* wait a while before checking status */ > + ata_wait_after_reset(ap, deadline); > > /* Before we perform post reset processing we want to see if > * the bus shows 0xFF because the odd clown forgets the D7 > @@ -3543,8 +3583,8 @@ int sata_std_hardreset(struct ata_port * > return 0; > } > > - /* wait a while before checking status, see SRST for more info */ > - msleep(150); > + /* wait a while before checking status */ > + ata_wait_after_reset(ap, deadline); > > rc = ata_wait_ready(ap, deadline); [...] > - msleep(150); > + /* wait a while before checking status */ > + ata_wait_after_reset(ap, deadline); > > /* Before we perform post reset processing we want to see if > * the bus shows 0xFF because the odd clown forgets the D7 > Index: work/drivers/ata/sata_inic162x.c > =================================================================== > --- work.orig/drivers/ata/sata_inic162x.c > +++ work/drivers/ata/sata_inic162x.c > @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static int inic_hardreset(struct ata_por > struct ata_taskfile tf; > > /* wait a while before checking status */ > - msleep(150); > + ata_wait_after_reset(ap, deadline); > > rc = ata_wait_ready(ap, deadline); [...] The main thing that bothers me is not the increase in delay, but the fact that this create converts a delay/Status-poll sequence into a delay/Status-poll/Status-poll sequence. ata_wait_after_reset() immediately before ata_wait_ready() seems highly redundant. Why not just poll Status once? Jeff