linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: "Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker" <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
	Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>,
	james.bottomley@steeleye.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	htejun@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] Enable Aggressive Link Power management for AHCI controllers.
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:59:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <466DFE09.3020408@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8jr6oikkcz.fsf@nygaard.ping.uio.no>

Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> writes:
> 
>> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
>>>> Setting		Effect
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>>> min_power	ALPM is enabled, and link set to enter 		lowest
>>>> power state (SLUMBER) when idle
>>>> 		Hot plug not allowed.
>>>>
>>>> max_performance	ALPM is disabled, Hot Plug is allowed
>>>>
>>>> medium_power	ALPM is enabled, and link set to enter
>>>> 		second lowest power state (PARTIAL) when
>>>> 		idle.  Hot plug not allowed.
>>> Just some food for thought:
>>> If you split it into a enable/disable (0/1) attribute, and a level
>>> attribute
>> on/off doesn't really make sense if the question is "do you favor power
>> or do you favor performance".......
> 
> How about just making it a numeric scale with 0 meaning no power saving
> and then some fixed number of levels (e.g 0-9)?

The original proposal seems far more intuitive than these alternatives.

	Jeff




  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-12  1:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20070611184146.448266229@intel.com>
2007-06-11 18:48 ` [patch 1/3] Store interrupt value Kristen Carlson Accardi
2007-06-11 19:59   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-11 18:48 ` [patch 2/3] Expose Power Management Policy option to users Kristen Carlson Accardi
2007-06-11 20:00   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-12 17:46     ` [patch 2a/3] " Kristen Carlson Accardi
2007-06-13 15:26       ` James Bottomley
2007-06-13 20:48         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-14 16:39         ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2007-06-14 17:44           ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-12 17:47     ` [patch 2b/3] " Kristen Carlson Accardi
2007-06-20 21:22     ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2007-06-11 18:48 ` [patch 3/3] Enable Aggressive Link Power management for AHCI controllers Kristen Carlson Accardi
2007-06-11 20:01   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-12  1:11   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-06-12  1:16     ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-12  1:54       ` Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
2007-06-12  1:59         ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-06-12  3:59           ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-06-12  3:59             ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-12  9:09               ` Matthew Garrett
2007-06-12 12:18                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-06-12 13:50                   ` Matthew Garrett
2007-06-12 14:17                     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-06-12 15:38                       ` Matthew Garrett
2007-06-12 15:45                         ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-12 15:56                           ` Matthew Garrett
2007-06-12 15:46                         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-12 15:58                           ` Matthew Garrett
2007-06-12 16:18                             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-12 16:27                           ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2007-06-20 21:23 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2007-06-21 13:08   ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-22 17:15     ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2007-06-22 19:00       ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-26 15:24         ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
     [not found] <20070801210713.809095009@intel.com>
2007-08-01 21:29 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=466DFE09.3020408@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=ilmari@ilmari.org \
    --cc=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=kristen.c.accardi@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).