From: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
To: Linux IDE <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Doug Maxey <dwm@enoyolf.org>
Subject: [PATCH/RFC 1/9] libata: remove irq_on from ata_bus_reset() and ata_std_postreset()
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:15:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46720466.6040909@tw.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46720353.90209@tw.ibm.com>
Patch 1/9:
It looks the calling of irq_on() in ata_bus_reset() and ata_std_postreset()
are leftover of the earlier EDD reset. Remove them.
Signed-off-by: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
---
diff -Nrup 00_libata-dev/drivers/ata/libata-core.c 01_remove_leftover_irqon/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
--- 00_libata-dev/drivers/ata/libata-core.c 2007-06-01 12:08:21.000000000 +0800
+++ 01_remove_leftover_irqon/drivers/ata/libata-core.c 2007-06-11 17:31:53.000000000 +0800
@@ -3190,9 +3190,6 @@ void ata_bus_reset(struct ata_port *ap)
if ((slave_possible) && (err != 0x81))
ap->device[1].class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 1, &err);
- /* re-enable interrupts */
- ap->ops->irq_on(ap);
-
/* is double-select really necessary? */
if (ap->device[1].class != ATA_DEV_NONE)
ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1);
@@ -3577,10 +3574,6 @@ void ata_std_postreset(struct ata_port *
if (sata_scr_read(ap, SCR_ERROR, &serror) == 0)
sata_scr_write(ap, SCR_ERROR, serror);
- /* re-enable interrupts */
- if (!ap->ops->error_handler)
- ap->ops->irq_on(ap);
-
/* is double-select really necessary? */
if (classes[0] != ATA_DEV_NONE)
ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1);
diff -Nrup 00_libata-dev/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c 01_remove_leftover_irqon/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
--- 00_libata-dev/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c 2007-06-01 12:08:21.000000000 +0800
+++ 01_remove_leftover_irqon/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c 2007-06-11 17:32:07.000000000 +0800
@@ -892,10 +892,6 @@ static void scc_std_postreset (struct at
{
DPRINTK("ENTER\n");
- /* re-enable interrupts */
- if (!ap->ops->error_handler)
- ap->ops->irq_on(ap);
-
/* is double-select really necessary? */
if (classes[0] != ATA_DEV_NONE)
ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-15 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-15 3:11 [PATCH/RFC 0/9] libata: irq_on/off restructuring Albert Lee
2007-06-15 3:15 ` Albert Lee [this message]
2007-06-15 3:17 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/9] libata: add irq_off() for symmetry Albert Lee
2007-06-15 3:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/9] libata: add ->irq_off() to LLDDs Albert Lee
2007-06-15 3:21 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/9] libata: call irq_off from bmdma_freeze() Albert Lee
2007-06-15 3:24 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/9] libata: use freeze()/thaw() for polling Albert Lee
2007-06-18 5:13 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-15 3:26 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/9] libata: add freeze()/thaw() to old EH LLDDs Albert Lee
2007-06-15 3:30 ` [PATCH/RFC 7/9] libata: pdc_freeze() semantic change Albert Lee
2007-06-18 5:14 ` Tejun Heo
2007-06-15 3:34 ` [PATCH/RFC 8/9] libata: remove writing of tf->ctl from ata_tf_load() Albert Lee
2007-06-15 3:44 ` [PATCH/RFC 9/9] libata: remove irq_on/off and rename freeze()/thaw() to irq_on/off Albert Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46720466.6040909@tw.ibm.com \
--to=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=albertl@mail.com \
--cc=dwm@enoyolf.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).