From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: hsm violation Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:15:06 +0900 Message-ID: <467F252A.5070607@gmail.com> References: <467E6456.4030503@tiscali.it> <20070624123022.541f2f78.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.179]:35662 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752341AbXFYCPL (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:15:11 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so1636514wah for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:15:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20070624123022.541f2f78.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: enricoss@tiscali.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik Andrew Morton wrote: > That great spew of "set_level status: 0" is fairly annoying and useless. I don't know where those are coming from. It's not from libata. -- tejun