From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400 Message-ID: <46854B29.80906@garzik.org> References: <46852187.3080504@googlemail.com> <20070629175920.6af0c62b@the-village.bc.nu> <468543CE.6080401@redhat.com> <20070629190602.4ef6a0cb@the-village.bc.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070629190602.4ef6a0cb@the-village.bc.nu> Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Chuck Ebbert , Michal Piotrowski , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , LKML , Rodrigo Luiz , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai , Jaroslav Kysela , Ben Collins , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, "Vladimir V. Saveliev" , Randy Dunlap , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, David Chinner , Tejun Heo , Rodney Gordon II List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: >>> I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ >>> storm >> Why does the driver report "irq 0"? >> >> ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd ctl bmdma irq 0 <==== >> >> Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20 > > Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ > values wrongly ? AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it remains broken... Jeff