From: Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: how to handle pata_via when controller not in fully-pci-native mode (two irqs?)
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:32:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <468A41CC.6030203@genesi-usa.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070703131736.5ddc0b89@the-village.bc.nu>
Alan Cox wrote:
>> We can't make the controller TRULY legacy since there is not any good way
>> of mapping the IDE/BMDMA registers into the lower kilobyte or so of
>> memory - obviously PPC has no "io address space", it's all memory mapped,
>> so the lower kilobyte of "IO ports" is really the CPU zero page. It's not
>> a good idea to be poking around just there and we never intended that to work.
>
> The right way to do this IMHO is still to use the PCI quirk side logic.
> Unfortunately to put your legacy ports at different I/O addresses you
> need changes which are still pending to the libata-sff code so that it
> stops using the hardcoded ATA_PRIMARY_FOO bits.
We can't move the IO ports. They're stuck in the PCI BAR.
All we can do is fix the IRQ steering in the "ISA bridge" to report a single
IRQ instead of two.
--
Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>
Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-03 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-23 0:26 how to handle pata_via when controller not in fully-pci-native mode (two irqs?) Matt Sealey
2007-06-23 4:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-23 9:33 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-23 9:33 ` Matt Sealey
2007-06-23 9:53 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-23 10:11 ` Matt Sealey
2007-07-03 7:33 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-03 8:11 ` Matt Sealey
2007-07-03 9:21 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-03 12:44 ` Matt Sealey
2007-07-03 12:17 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-03 12:32 ` Matt Sealey [this message]
2007-07-03 13:38 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-03 13:41 ` Matt Sealey
2007-07-03 13:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-03 14:00 ` Matt Sealey
2007-07-03 15:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-03 13:53 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-03 13:54 ` Matt Sealey
2007-07-04 8:55 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-04 19:08 ` Matt Sealey
2007-07-05 2:28 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=468A41CC.6030203@genesi-usa.com \
--to=matt@genesi-usa.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).