From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chuck Ebbert Subject: Another Maxtor drive with broken NCQ Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:45:53 -0400 Message-ID: <468E8DE1.9010405@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:37349 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754333AbXGFSpz (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:45:55 -0400 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l66IjsPt029354 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:45:54 -0400 Received: from mail.boston.redhat.com (mail.boston.redhat.com [172.16.76.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l66IjsFv017263 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:45:54 -0400 Received: from [172.16.83.145] (dhcp83-145.boston.redhat.com [172.16.83.145]) by mail.boston.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l66IjrEv025295 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:45:53 -0400 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: IDE/ATA development list From: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246352 Looks like this entry is needed in the NCQ blacklist: {"Maxtor 6B200M0", "BANC1BM0", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ } Or should *all* Maxtor 6B200M0 be blacklisted, since there's already one of them in the list?