From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: State of Port Multiplier Support in libata? Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:42:56 +0900 Message-ID: <469192A0.6090005@gmail.com> References: <4684D54A.8030307@enhance-it.dk> <4688A74B.7000604@gmail.com> <4688AB51.8080801@enhance-it.dk> <4688AE9D.7060008@gmail.com> <4688C3AF.2060100@enhance-it.dk> <4688C700.6070901@gmail.com> <4688FC96.7040604@enhance-it.dk> <4689149E.5030704@gmail.com> <46896824.2030507@enhance-it.dk> <4689BD18.6030202@gmail.com> <469133A3.6080805@enhance-it.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.226]:27904 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755344AbXGIBnB (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2007 21:43:01 -0400 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so528626nze for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 18:43:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <469133A3.6080805@enhance-it.dk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Stefan Skotte Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hello, Stefan Skotte wrote: > On the 1.5Gbps vs. 3.0Gbps issue I had, the problem was just that I > hadn't paid attention to the factory default jumpers... They were set to > 1.5Gbps ( I guess they do that for legacy purposes) :) Okay. > Do you want me to perform any other tests? Not at the moment. > PS: Are you going to convert the patches for ipr.c & ipr.h so you can > apply the libata-tj patches without removing them ? Yeah, now that 2.6.23-rc1 is open. I'll update those and resubmit the patch. Thanks. -- tejun