From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Backlund Subject: Re: Problem with SiS Ide/Pata/Sata on 2.6.22-rc7-git4 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:40:26 +0300 Message-ID: <4692B95A.2020400@mandriva.org> References: <4692A7C3.9030802@mandriva.org> <20070709232742.004def28@the-village.bc.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mbox1.netikka.net ([213.250.81.202]:55591 "EHLO mbox1.netikka.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754818AbXGIWk3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:40:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070709232742.004def28@the-village.bc.nu> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox skrev: >> If you modprobe only sis5513 >> OR >> If you modprobe only sis5513 and then sata_sis/pata_sis: >> - you get this: >> (the hdb drive does not get detected/usable) > > Don't mix old and new IDE like that. We allow both so you can use old SIS > and new Jmicron etc for example but there are some cases where trying to > load both old and new IDE support for the same chip will do strange > things. > > Alan > > So this means that if you want to use pata & sata disks connected to sis chipset you cant use sis5513 at all, if I understand this correct? If that's the case I guess we simply have to blacklist (or stop building) the sis5513 and force all sis ide users to pata_sis... Now, do you consider pata_sis as stable as the sis5513 ? -- Thomas