From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:00:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4696965E.70403@garzik.org> References: <20070709143841.133abb71@the-village.bc.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:56088 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760514AbXGLVAR (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:00:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070709143841.133abb71@the-village.bc.nu> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Alan Cox wrote: > Underneath all the HPT packaging, PCI identifiers, binary driver modules > and stuff you find that ... > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox > > --- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c~ 2007-07-09 13:19:57.003052904 +0100 > +++ drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2007-07-09 13:19:57.004052752 +0100 > @@ -573,6 +573,9 @@ > { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5041), chip_504x }, > { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5080), chip_5080 }, > { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x }, > + /* RocketRAID 1740/174x have different identifiers */ > + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x }, > + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x }, If your testers could re-test on top of what I just submitted to Linus, that would be most helpful. My non-RocketRAID 5081 works just fine, but sata_mv received some major changes and bug fixes, which could potentially change behavior here. Since we're guessing (I assume?), I definitely want to make sure we have the correct MV variant for use with RocketRAID. Any idea if RocketRAID is marketed as SATA-II or with NCQ support? ("queueing" in marketing lit doesn't help, alas). Jeff