linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: Vitaly Bordug <vitb@kernel.crashing.org>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IDE] Platform IDE driver (was: MMIO IDE driver)
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:01:27 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A7AC17.9060309@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0707252150540.6234@poirot.grange>

Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:

>>>>This is now very similar to pata_platform.c, they both use
>>>>same platform data structure and same resources.

>>>>To achieve that, byte_lanes_swapping platform data variable
>>>>and platform specified iops removed from that driver. It's fine,
>>>>since those were never used anyway.

>>>>pata_platform and ide_platform are carrying same driver names,
>>>>to easily switch between these drivers, without need to touch
>>>>platform code.

>>>Why? There's a drivers/ide/arm/ide_arm.c IDe driver that some platforms (not
>>>in the mainline) hack to access, e.g., CF cards in true-IDE mode. About a
>>>month ago I submitted a patch to arm-linux-kernel switching that 

>>   Wrong list to submit sych stuff, post to linux-ide.

> Not entirely. The patch (or other patches in the series) would also touch 
> ARM platforms in the mainline, currently using that driver. As I didn't 

    Was worth cross-posting to linux-ide anyway to get the IDE experts' 
feedback. ;-)

> have a chance to test them due to lack of hardware, I posted on arm, 
> asking if anyone would test those platforms for me.

   ... and they laughed at you? ;-)

>>>driver to using platform-device. I got a reply, that it's not worth it now
>>>that IDE is slowly becoming obsolete, and the pata_platform serves the
>>>perpose perfectly well. I found this argument reasonable, I had the same

>>   Ignore such replies in the future. ;-)

> It was largely in accordance with my own opinion, so, I chose to accept 
> it:-)

    It's not clear why you decided to waste time on it then. :-)

>>>doubt, just wanted to double-check. So, why do we now need a new legacy
>>>(a/drivers/ide/legacy/ide_platform.c) driver when a "modern" driver exists?

>>   Good question (I know the answer but won't tell ;-).

> You've been very cooperative, thanks.

    In fact, I also highly doubt that we need it.  What we'd need is an OF driver.

> Thanks
> Guennadi

WBR, Sergei

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-25 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-25 16:53 [PATCH 1/2] [IDE] Platform IDE driver (was: MMIO IDE driver) Vitaly Bordug
2007-07-25 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] MPC8349E-mITX: use platform IDE driver for CF interface Vitaly Bordug
2007-07-25 17:06   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-25 17:54     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-25 18:01       ` Scott Wood
2007-07-25 18:19         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-25 18:39           ` Scott Wood
2007-07-25 19:30             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-26 16:24               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-31 22:47             ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-07-25 18:29         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-25 18:46           ` Scott Wood
2007-07-26 17:21             ` Vitaly Bordug
2007-07-26 17:45               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-31 22:36       ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-07-31 23:56         ` Alan Cox
2007-08-06 17:19           ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-01 13:11         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-26 17:12     ` Vitaly Bordug
2007-07-25 17:29   ` Scott Wood
2007-07-25 17:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] [IDE] Platform IDE driver (was: MMIO IDE driver) Alan Cox
2007-07-26 19:28   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-07-25 17:59 ` Kumar Gala
2007-07-25 19:00 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-25 19:05   ` Scott Wood
2007-07-25 19:16     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-25 19:17       ` [PATCH 1/2] [IDE] Platform IDE driver Scott Wood
2007-07-25 19:35         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-31 22:31           ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-01 12:39             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-08-06 17:16               ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] [IDE] Platform IDE driver (was: MMIO IDE driver) Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-07-25 19:48   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-25 19:54     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-07-25 20:01       ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2007-07-25 20:09         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-07-25 20:39   ` Alan Cox
2007-07-26 19:41     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-07-26 19:52       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-26 20:13         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-07-26 20:11       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-07-26 19:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46A7AC17.9060309@ru.mvista.com \
    --to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=vitb@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).