From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: implement BROKEN_HPA horkage and apply it to HDS724040KLSA80 Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:28 +0900 Message-ID: <46B8890C.7090403@gmail.com> References: <20070807054250.GQ13674@htj.dyndns.org> <20070807115105.4f5cbc66@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.185]:52253 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756782AbXHGPAf (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:00:35 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so1416276rvb for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 08:00:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20070807115105.4f5cbc66@localhost> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, kelk1@comcast.net Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote: > Em Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:42:50 +0900 > Tejun Heo escreveu: > > | HDS724040KLSA80 reports that it supports HPA && LBA48 but craps itself > | on READ_NATIVE_MAX_EXT. Implement BROKEN_HPA horkage and apply it to > | the drive. If the horkage is set, all HPA operations are skipped. > | > | While at it, make HPA test a bit more reliable by also checking > | ata_id_has_hpa(). > > Tejun, is the following patch ok for 2.6.22.1? Yeah, looks okay to me but -stable needs to wait for upstream merge. Thanks. -- tejun