From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hpt366: fix PCI clock detection for HPT374 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:29:14 +0400 Message-ID: <46BCA06A.8040609@ru.mvista.com> References: <200708060006.35511.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <20070806202958.25670cc1@the-village.bc.nu> <46BC8747.4020307@ru.mvista.com> <20070810181907.61fd514d@the-village.bc.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:56463 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756442AbXHJR1E (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:27:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070810181907.61fd514d@the-village.bc.nu> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, rah@bash.sh, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: >>>>+ if (chip_type == HPT374 && (PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn) & 1)) { >>>>+ struct pci_dev *dev1 = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, >>>>+ dev->devfn - 1); >>>Can be NULL >> Not really. This may not be called if it's NULL -- see hpt374_init_setup(). >>Maybe worth a comment though... >>>>+ unsigned long io_base = pci_resource_start(dev1, 4); >> >>>Kaboom >> >> That was a dud bomb. ;-) > What stops a hot unplug of a 374 from causing that to occur. I don't see Pinned as in pci_get_device()? If so, see setup-ide.c:ide_scan_pcibus(). The IDE core does that for me. > where you have the other pci_dev pinned on a hotplug on a box set to scan > the devices in reverse order Function 1 will always be skipped, regardless of the scan order. > (yes its an extremely obscure case ;)) "Security through obscurity". :-) MBR, Sergei