From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.23-rc3] Regression: "spurious completions during NCQ"
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:32:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C2AC17.2070606@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708150921.32160.elendil@planet.nl>
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Frans Pop wrote:
>>> I've been running 2.6.23-rc2 without problems. Today I compiled
>>> 2.6.23-rc3 and shortly after boot got the following messages in my
>>> logs:
>>>
>>> kernel: ata1.00: spurious completions during NCQ issue=0x0 SAct=0x7ffc7 FIS=005040a1:00000020
>>> kernel: ata1.00: cmd 61/30:00:73:96:db/00:00:04:00:00/40 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 24576 out
>>> kernel: res 50/00:08:7b:97:db/00:00:04:00:00/40 Emask 0x2 (HSM
>>> violation)
>>> [...]
>>> kernel: ata1: soft resetting port
>> How reproducible is the problem?
>
> Not reproducible at all, at least it has not happened again. Guess it may
> have been unrelated to rc3.
>
> I had rebooted with a change in the BIOS config, but that was only to
> change the active video controller. Don't know how that could affect this.
> OTOH, I pulled that video card out of the system later and that solved a
> longstanding issue I've had with powering off this system [1]...
>
> I did find one other soft reset in my kernel logs (which go back to Okt 2006,
> 2.6.18); that was on Aug 1 with 2.6.22, but after a different error:
> kernel: ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action0x2 frozen
> kernel: ata3.00: cmd a0/00:00:00:00:20/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 cdb 0x1b data 0
> kernel: res 40/00:03:00:00:20/00:00:00:00:00/a0 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
> kernel: ata3: soft resetting port
> kernel: ata3: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> kernel: ata3.00: configured for UDMA/66
> kernel: ata3: EH complete
>
> As ata3 is a DVD-RW, I'm a bit less concerned about that one.
You don't need to worry too much as long as errors are properly
recovered. All commands are retried and you won't lose any data.
Please report if the spurious NCQ problem happens again. Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-15 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-13 18:05 [2.6.23-rc3] Regression: "spurious completions during NCQ" Frans Pop
2007-08-14 10:11 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-15 7:21 ` Frans Pop
2007-08-15 7:32 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-22 13:11 Carsten Otto
2007-10-04 16:16 ` Carsten Otto
2007-10-24 10:18 ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-28 20:53 ` Carsten Otto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46C2AC17.2070606@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).