From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
albertl@mail.com, jeff@garzik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc3] pata_pdc2027x: PLL detection fixes
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:13:46 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C86C3A.7000404@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708182058.l7IKwrcJ016820@harpo.it.uu.se>
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Previously I reported that the pata_pdc2027x PLL detection changes
> in kernel 2.6.22 broke the driver on my PowerMac:
>>pata_pdc2027x: Invalid PLL input clock 1691742kHz, give up!
> This is followed by a number of errors and speed reduction
> steps on the affected ports.
> There are two bugs in pata_pdc2027x's PLL detection code:
> 1. The PLL counter's start value is read before the chip is
> put in "test mode". Outside of test mode the counter is
> halted, and on the PowerMac the counter is zero because
> the chip hasn't been initialised by its BIOS.
So what?
> The fix is to move the read of the start value to after
> test mode is started, but before the mdelay() in test mode.
This is not an issue, so no fix is needed.
> This also improves the precision of the PLL detection.
BTW, looks like we don't even need to bother reading the darn counter
beforehand: bit 1 of the indexed register 1 (the same used to enter/exit test
mode by twiddling its bit 6) when being cleared should reset the counter to 0
-- I'm looking at the internal sources which were written based on the
*fragment* of the PDC20270 datasheet (yeah, Promise didn't even give us the
whole datasheet!) about the PLL calibration.
> 2. The code to compute the number of PLL decrements during the
> mdelay() in test mode fails to consider that the PLL counter
> only is 30 bits wide. If there is a wraparound, it will compute
> an incorrect and much too large value. On the PowerMac, the
> start count is zero, the end count is a large 30-bit value, so
> wraparound occurs and an out of bounds PLL clock is detected.
> The fix is to mask the (start - end) computation to 30 bits.
Yeah, that's what I've done for the old IDE driver...
> While debugging this I also noticed that pdc_read_counter()
> reads the two halves of the 30-bit PLL counter as 16-bit values,
> and then combines them as if the halves only are 15 bits wide.
> To avoid confusion, the halves should be read as 15-bit values.
Shouldn't matter, the bit is most probably reseved and so always remains 0.
Actually, those 2 counters count the data bytes transferred over PCI bus when
the chip in not in the test mode.
> This patch implements all three changes. It fixes the PLL detection
> failure on my PowerMac, and doesn't cause any regressions on an x86
> with an identical card.
> Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
> diff -rupN linux-2.6.23-rc3/drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c linux-2.6.23-rc3.pata_pdc2027x-pll-detection-fixes/drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc3/drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c 2007-07-09 22:01:31.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc3.pata_pdc2027x-pll-detection-fixes/drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c 2007-08-18 21:53:40.000000000 +0200
[...]
> @@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ static long pdc_detect_pll_input_clock(s
> usec_elapsed = (end_time.tv_sec - start_time.tv_sec) * 1000000 +
> (end_time.tv_usec - start_time.tv_usec);
>
> - pll_clock = (start_count - end_count) / 100 *
> + pll_clock = ((start_count - end_count) & 0x3fffffff) / 100 *
> (100000000 / usec_elapsed);
>
> PDPRINTK("start[%ld] end[%ld] \n", start_count, end_count);
Only this fragment really matters.
MBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-19 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-18 20:58 [PATCH 2.6.23-rc3] pata_pdc2027x: PLL detection fixes Mikael Pettersson
2007-08-18 21:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-19 0:14 ` Albert Lee
2007-08-19 0:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-19 1:03 ` Albert Lee
2007-08-20 8:56 ` [PATCH 2.6.23-rc3] libata: pata_pdc2027x PLL detection minor cleanup Albert Lee
2007-08-31 9:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-19 0:01 ` [PATCH 2.6.23-rc3] pata_pdc2027x: PLL detection fixes Albert Lee
2007-08-19 16:13 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2007-08-23 9:32 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-19 17:17 Mikael Pettersson
2007-08-19 17:51 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-08-19 19:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-24 16:29 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-08-21 10:30 ` Albert Lee
2007-08-24 16:24 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-08-24 18:31 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-08-24 18:44 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46C86C3A.7000404@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=albertl@mail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).