From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pdc202xx_new: fix PCI refcounting
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:56:49 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46D17891.4010007@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708212201.36591.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>>The driver erroneously "lets go" the mate IDE chip in init_setup_pdc20270()
>>when ide_setup_pci_devices() call succeeds -- fix this, and drop a couple of
>>useless assignments in this function while at it...
>>Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
> applied but
>>---
>>This patch is against the current Linus' tree, it has only been compile tested
>>since I do not have PDC2027x chips (and even less so behind DC21150 bridge :-).
>>Index: linux-2.6/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.c
>>===================================================================
>>--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.c
>>+++ linux-2.6/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.c
[...]
>>@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static int __devinit init_setup_pdcnew(s
>> static int __devinit init_setup_pdc20270(struct pci_dev *dev,
>> ide_pci_device_t *d)
>> {
>>- struct pci_dev *findev = NULL;
>>+ struct pci_dev *findev;
> drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.c: In function ‘init_setup_pdc20270’:
> drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_new.c:530: warning: ‘findev’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> with gcc version 4.1.2 20070626 (Red Hat 4.1.2-13)
> Seems to be gcc problem
No, it must be all those pills I'm taking... ;-)
> but I reverted this chunk.
And you were absolutely right -- findev must be NULL for the search to go
thru all the PCI devices. :-/
> Update: after applying patch #2/2 and fixing the reject caused by the above change
> warning disappears (patch #2/2 besides renaming "findev" to "dev2" moves the code
> around making it easier for gcc to deduce what is going on :).
Right, because pci_get_slot() is not a "device scanner" and so doesn't
need the starting node.
I guess there's no need to recast now?
WBR, Sergei
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-26 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-18 18:46 [PATCH 1/2] pdc202xx_new: fix PCI refcounting Sergei Shtylyov
2007-08-21 20:01 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-08-26 12:56 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46D17891.4010007@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).