linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
To: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Resets on sil3124 & sil3726 PMP
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:11:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46D2792B.401@vc.cvut.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46D2595B.1030409@sauce.co.nz>

Richard Scobie wrote:
>  > 3726/4726 work very well under high load with most drives.  I guess
>  > you had some problem with the cage.
> 
> Does anyone have any performance figures to share, with these PMP 
> interfaces?

Hello,
   what exactly you are looking for?  For me it behaves exactly as 
intended, and I did not notice any problems.  When I communicate with 
only one harddrive then performance is same as native.  When I 
communicate with more than one drive, then of course bandwidth between 
host and PMP becomes bottleneck.  /dev/sdf is using 1.5Gbps, everybody 
else claims 3.0Gbps.  Not that I see any difference :-(

Though I do not run any RAID on them (I would say that with PMP's 
bottleneck it would be bad idea), so maybe I'm not stressing them 
sufficiently to trip over bugs.

/dev/sda: 320GB Hitachi on sata_nv
/dev/sdb: 1TB Hitachi on sata_sil24 + 3726 (Sans Digital MS4UM)
/dev/sdc: 750GB Seagate on sata_sil24 + 3726
/dev/sdd: 1TB Hitachi on sata_sil24 + 3726
/dev/sde: 750GB Seagate on sata_sil24 + 3726
/dev/sdf: Sans Digital MS2UT with two 750GB in RAID1 on second sil24 port

gwy:~# for a in /dev/sd[abcdef]; do hdparm -t $a; done

/dev/sda:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  214 MB in  3.01 seconds =  71.07 MB/sec

/dev/sdb:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  236 MB in  3.00 seconds =  78.58 MB/sec

/dev/sdc:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  220 MB in  3.02 seconds =  72.74 MB/sec

/dev/sdd:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  240 MB in  3.02 seconds =  79.41 MB/sec

/dev/sde:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  218 MB in  3.00 seconds =  72.64 MB/sec

/dev/sdf:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  226 MB in  3.02 seconds =  74.95 MB/sec

Apparently 1TB Hitachis are slightly faster than 750GB Seagates...

gwy:~# hdparm -t /dev/sdb & hdparm -t /dev/sdd & sleep 20
(reformatted to show values in order, not interleaved)

/dev/sdd:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  158 MB in  3.02 seconds =  52.40 MB/sec

/dev/sdb:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  168 MB in  3.02 seconds =  55.68 MB/sec

gwy:~# hdparm -t /dev/sdc & hdparm -t /dev/sde & sleep 20

/dev/sde:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  168 MB in  3.01 seconds =  55.89 MB/sec

/dev/sdc:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  150 MB in  3.01 seconds =  49.77 MB/sec

gwy:~# hdparm -t /dev/sdb & hdparm -t /dev/sdc & hdparm -t /dev/sdd & 
hdparm -t /dev/sde & sleep 20

/dev/sde:
  Timing buffered disk reads:   98 MB in  3.02 seconds =  32.46 MB/sec

/dev/sdd:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  100 MB in  3.06 seconds =  32.73 MB/sec

/dev/sdc:
  Timing buffered disk reads:   92 MB in  3.07 seconds =  30.01 MB/sec

/dev/sdb:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  118 MB in  3.05 seconds =  38.75 MB/sec

gwy:~# hdparm -t /dev/sdb & hdparm -t /dev/sdf & sleep 20

/dev/sdb:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  194 MB in  3.02 seconds =  64.31 MB/sec

/dev/sdf:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  224 MB in  3.02 seconds =  74.09 MB/sec

gwy:~# hdparm -t /dev/sda & hdparm -t /dev/sdb & hdparm -t /dev/sdc & 
hdparm -t /dev/sdd & hdparm -t /dev/sde & hdparm -t /dev/sdf & sleep 20

/dev/sda:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  200 MB in  3.03 seconds =  66.00 MB/sec

/dev/sdf:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  220 MB in  3.05 seconds =  72.11 MB/sec

/dev/sde:
  Timing buffered disk reads:   58 MB in  3.03 seconds =  19.12 MB/sec

/dev/sdd:
  Timing buffered disk reads:   64 MB in  3.04 seconds =  21.06 MB/sec

/dev/sdb:
  Timing buffered disk reads:   70 MB in  3.03 seconds =  23.10 MB/sec

/dev/sdc:
  Timing buffered disk reads:   56 MB in  3.01 seconds =  18.59 MB/sec

gwy:~#


For comparsion 1TB Hitachi behind 3726 PMP (again MS4UM) with sata_sil 
patch I sent last week (no NCQ, 1.5Gbps link between 3512 and PMP, and 
3.0Gbps link between PMP and drive... why is it faster?):

petr-dev3:~# hdparm -t /dev/sdd

/dev/sdd:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  248 MB in  3.01 seconds =  82.48 MB/sec

petr-dev3:~#

							Petr



  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-27  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-27  4:55 Resets on sil3124 & sil3726 PMP Richard Scobie
2007-08-27  7:11 ` Petr Vandrovec [this message]
2007-09-03  8:59   ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-03  9:57     ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-03 12:50       ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-04  1:38         ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-05 12:08           ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-05 21:30             ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-09-06  9:52               ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-06 18:02                 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-06 17:59             ` Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-03 19:39 Richard Scobie
2007-09-03 20:34 ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-09-03 21:21   ` Richard Scobie
2007-08-27  8:08 Richard Scobie
2007-08-27 22:49 ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-08-15 13:58 Rusty Conover
2007-08-17 18:06 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-20 19:56   ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-21  2:42     ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-22  3:03       ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-22  5:00         ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-22  5:43           ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-22  6:11             ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-22  6:39               ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-22  6:56                 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-22  7:02                   ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-22  7:49                     ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-25  2:19                       ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-26 16:37                         ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-27  1:18                           ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-14 23:39 Rusty Conover
2007-08-15  6:10 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46D2792B.401@vc.cvut.cz \
    --to=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@sauce.co.nz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).