linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments
@ 2007-08-08  5:37 Tejun Heo
  2007-08-08  5:40 ` [PATCH 2/2 #upstream] libata: assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure Tejun Heo
  2007-08-31  9:18 ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-08-08  5:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik, linux-ide, Alan Cox, amsden_linux

Make ata_dev_try_classify() take a pointer to ata_device instead of
ata_port/port_number combination for consistency and add @present
argument.  @present indicates whether the device seems present during
reset.  It's the result of TF access during softreset and link
onlineness during hardreset.  @present will be used to improve
diagnostic failure handling.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 drivers/ata/pata_scc.c    |    6 ++++--
 drivers/ata/sata_mv.c     |    2 +-
 include/linux/libata.h    |    3 ++-
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: work/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ work/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -696,8 +696,8 @@ unsigned int ata_dev_classify(const stru
 
 /**
  *	ata_dev_try_classify - Parse returned ATA device signature
- *	@ap: ATA channel to examine
- *	@device: Device to examine (starting at zero)
+ *	@dev: ATA device to classify (starting at zero)
+ *	@present: device seems present
  *	@r_err: Value of error register on completion
  *
  *	After an event -- SRST, E.D.D., or SATA COMRESET -- occurs,
@@ -715,15 +715,15 @@ unsigned int ata_dev_classify(const stru
  *	RETURNS:
  *	Device type - %ATA_DEV_ATA, %ATA_DEV_ATAPI or %ATA_DEV_NONE.
  */
-
-unsigned int
-ata_dev_try_classify(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int device, u8 *r_err)
+unsigned int ata_dev_try_classify(struct ata_device *dev, int present,
+				  u8 *r_err)
 {
+	struct ata_port *ap = dev->ap;
 	struct ata_taskfile tf;
 	unsigned int class;
 	u8 err;
 
-	ap->ops->dev_select(ap, device);
+	ap->ops->dev_select(ap, dev->devno);
 
 	memset(&tf, 0, sizeof(tf));
 
@@ -733,12 +733,12 @@ ata_dev_try_classify(struct ata_port *ap
 		*r_err = err;
 
 	/* see if device passed diags: if master then continue and warn later */
-	if (err == 0 && device == 0)
+	if (err == 0 && dev->devno == 0)
 		/* diagnostic fail : do nothing _YET_ */
-		ap->device[device].horkage |= ATA_HORKAGE_DIAGNOSTIC;
+		dev->horkage |= ATA_HORKAGE_DIAGNOSTIC;
 	else if (err == 1)
 		/* do nothing */ ;
-	else if ((device == 0) && (err == 0x81))
+	else if ((dev->devno == 0) && (err == 0x81))
 		/* do nothing */ ;
 	else
 		return ATA_DEV_NONE;
@@ -3176,9 +3176,10 @@ void ata_bus_reset(struct ata_port *ap)
 	/*
 	 * determine by signature whether we have ATA or ATAPI devices
 	 */
-	ap->device[0].class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 0, &err);
+	ap->device[0].class = ata_dev_try_classify(&ap->device[0], dev0, &err);
 	if ((slave_possible) && (err != 0x81))
-		ap->device[1].class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 1, &err);
+		ap->device[1].class = ata_dev_try_classify(&ap->device[1],
+							   dev1, &err);
 
 	/* is double-select really necessary? */
 	if (ap->device[1].class != ATA_DEV_NONE)
@@ -3415,9 +3416,11 @@ int ata_std_softreset(struct ata_port *a
 	}
 
 	/* determine by signature whether we have ATA or ATAPI devices */
-	classes[0] = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 0, &err);
+	classes[0] = ata_dev_try_classify(&ap->device[0],
+					  devmask & (1 << 0), &err);
 	if (slave_possible && err != 0x81)
-		classes[1] = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 1, &err);
+		classes[1] = ata_dev_try_classify(&ap->device[1],
+						  devmask & (1 << 1), &err);
 
  out:
 	DPRINTK("EXIT, classes[0]=%u [1]=%u\n", classes[0], classes[1]);
@@ -3535,7 +3538,7 @@ int sata_std_hardreset(struct ata_port *
 
 	ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 0);	/* probably unnecessary */
 
-	*class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 0, NULL);
+	*class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap->device, 1, NULL);
 
 	DPRINTK("EXIT, class=%u\n", *class);
 	return 0;
Index: work/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
+++ work/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
@@ -636,9 +636,11 @@ static int scc_std_softreset (struct ata
 	}
 
 	/* determine by signature whether we have ATA or ATAPI devices */
-	classes[0] = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 0, &err);
+	classes[0] = ata_dev_try_classify(&ap->device[0],
+					  devmask & (1 << 0), &err);
 	if (slave_possible && err != 0x81)
-		classes[1] = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 1, &err);
+		classes[1] = ata_dev_try_classify(&ap->device[1],
+						  devmask & (1 << 1), &err);
 
  out:
 	DPRINTK("EXIT, classes[0]=%u [1]=%u\n", classes[0], classes[1]);
Index: work/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
+++ work/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
@@ -2233,7 +2233,7 @@ comreset_retry:
 	 */
 
 	/* finally, read device signature from TF registers */
-	*class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 0, NULL);
+	*class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap->device, 1, NULL);
 
 	writelfl(0, port_mmio + EDMA_ERR_IRQ_CAUSE_OFS);
 
Index: work/include/linux/libata.h
===================================================================
--- work.orig/include/linux/libata.h
+++ work/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -764,7 +764,8 @@ extern void ata_port_queue_task(struct a
 extern u32 ata_wait_register(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask, u32 val,
 			     unsigned long interval_msec,
 			     unsigned long timeout_msec);
-extern unsigned int ata_dev_try_classify(struct ata_port *, unsigned int, u8 *);
+extern unsigned int ata_dev_try_classify(struct ata_device *dev, int present,
+					 u8 *r_err);
 
 /*
  * Default driver ops implementations

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2 #upstream] libata: assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure
  2007-08-08  5:37 [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments Tejun Heo
@ 2007-08-08  5:40 ` Tejun Heo
  2007-08-08  8:33   ` Alan Cox
  2007-08-31  9:18 ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments Jeff Garzik
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-08-08  5:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik, linux-ide, Alan Cox, amsden_linux

Certain device which reports diagnostic failure also reports invalid
device signature.  Assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure if reset
indicates device presence.

This is fix for bugzilla bug 8784.

  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8784

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Edward Amsden <amsden_linux@earthlink.net>
---
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c |   18 ++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: work/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ work/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -746,10 +746,20 @@ unsigned int ata_dev_try_classify(struct
 	/* determine if device is ATA or ATAPI */
 	class = ata_dev_classify(&tf);
 
-	if (class == ATA_DEV_UNKNOWN)
-		return ATA_DEV_NONE;
-	if ((class == ATA_DEV_ATA) && (ata_chk_status(ap) == 0))
-		return ATA_DEV_NONE;
+	if (class == ATA_DEV_UNKNOWN) {
+		/* If the device failed diagnostic, it's likely to
+		 * have reported incorrect device signature too.
+		 * Assume ATA device if the device seems present but
+		 * device signature is invalid with diagnostic
+		 * failure.
+		 */
+		if (present && (dev->horkage & ATA_HORKAGE_DIAGNOSTIC))
+			class = ATA_DEV_ATA;
+		else
+			class = ATA_DEV_NONE;
+	} else if ((class == ATA_DEV_ATA) && (ata_chk_status(ap) == 0))
+		class = ATA_DEV_NONE;
+
 	return class;
 }
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2 #upstream] libata: assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure
  2007-08-08  5:40 ` [PATCH 2/2 #upstream] libata: assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure Tejun Heo
@ 2007-08-08  8:33   ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2007-08-08  8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: Jeff Garzik, linux-ide, amsden_linux

On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:40:08 +0900
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:

> Certain device which reports diagnostic failure also reports invalid
> device signature.  Assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure if reset
> indicates device presence.
> 
> This is fix for bugzilla bug 8784.

Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments
  2007-08-08  5:37 [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments Tejun Heo
  2007-08-08  5:40 ` [PATCH 2/2 #upstream] libata: assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure Tejun Heo
@ 2007-08-31  9:18 ` Jeff Garzik
  2007-09-02 14:23   ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] " Tejun Heo
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2007-08-31  9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: linux-ide, Alan Cox, amsden_linux

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Make ata_dev_try_classify() take a pointer to ata_device instead of
> ata_port/port_number combination for consistency and add @present
> argument.  @present indicates whether the device seems present during
> reset.  It's the result of TF access during softreset and link
> onlineness during hardreset.  @present will be used to improve
> diagnostic failure handling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/ata/pata_scc.c    |    6 ++++--
>  drivers/ata/sata_mv.c     |    2 +-
>  include/linux/libata.h    |    3 ++-
>  4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

ACK patches 1-2

request rediff+resend



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments
  2007-08-31  9:18 ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments Jeff Garzik
@ 2007-09-02 14:23   ` Tejun Heo
  2007-09-02 14:24     ` [PATCH 2/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] libata: assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure Tejun Heo
  2007-09-20 21:32     ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-09-02 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: linux-ide, Alan Cox, amsden_linux

Make ata_dev_try_classify() take a pointer to ata_device instead of
ata_port/port_number combination for consistency and add @present
argument.  @present indicates whether the device seems present during
reset.  It's the result of TF access during softreset and link
onlineness during hardreset.  @present will be used to improve
diagnostic failure handling.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
 drivers/ata/pata_scc.c    |    6 ++++--
 drivers/ata/sata_mv.c     |    2 +-
 include/linux/libata.h    |    3 ++-
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: work/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ work/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -701,8 +701,8 @@ unsigned int ata_dev_classify(const stru
 
 /**
  *	ata_dev_try_classify - Parse returned ATA device signature
- *	@ap: ATA channel to examine
- *	@device: Device to examine (starting at zero)
+ *	@dev: ATA device to classify (starting at zero)
+ *	@present: device seems present
  *	@r_err: Value of error register on completion
  *
  *	After an event -- SRST, E.D.D., or SATA COMRESET -- occurs,
@@ -720,15 +720,15 @@ unsigned int ata_dev_classify(const stru
  *	RETURNS:
  *	Device type - %ATA_DEV_ATA, %ATA_DEV_ATAPI or %ATA_DEV_NONE.
  */
-
-unsigned int
-ata_dev_try_classify(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int device, u8 *r_err)
+unsigned int ata_dev_try_classify(struct ata_device *dev, int present,
+				  u8 *r_err)
 {
+	struct ata_port *ap = dev->link->ap;
 	struct ata_taskfile tf;
 	unsigned int class;
 	u8 err;
 
-	ap->ops->dev_select(ap, device);
+	ap->ops->dev_select(ap, dev->devno);
 
 	memset(&tf, 0, sizeof(tf));
 
@@ -738,12 +738,12 @@ ata_dev_try_classify(struct ata_port *ap
 		*r_err = err;
 
 	/* see if device passed diags: if master then continue and warn later */
-	if (err == 0 && device == 0)
+	if (err == 0 && dev->devno == 0)
 		/* diagnostic fail : do nothing _YET_ */
-		ap->link.device[device].horkage |= ATA_HORKAGE_DIAGNOSTIC;
+		dev->horkage |= ATA_HORKAGE_DIAGNOSTIC;
 	else if (err == 1)
 		/* do nothing */ ;
-	else if ((device == 0) && (err == 0x81))
+	else if ((dev->devno == 0) && (err == 0x81))
 		/* do nothing */ ;
 	else
 		return ATA_DEV_NONE;
@@ -3212,9 +3212,9 @@ void ata_bus_reset(struct ata_port *ap)
 	/*
 	 * determine by signature whether we have ATA or ATAPI devices
 	 */
-	device[0].class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 0, &err);
+	device[0].class = ata_dev_try_classify(&device[0], dev0, &err);
 	if ((slave_possible) && (err != 0x81))
-		device[1].class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 1, &err);
+		device[1].class = ata_dev_try_classify(&device[1], dev1, &err);
 
 	/* is double-select really necessary? */
 	if (device[1].class != ATA_DEV_NONE)
@@ -3453,9 +3453,11 @@ int ata_std_softreset(struct ata_link *l
 	}
 
 	/* determine by signature whether we have ATA or ATAPI devices */
-	classes[0] = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 0, &err);
+	classes[0] = ata_dev_try_classify(&link->device[0],
+					  devmask & (1 << 0), &err);
 	if (slave_possible && err != 0x81)
-		classes[1] = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 1, &err);
+		classes[1] = ata_dev_try_classify(&link->device[1],
+						  devmask & (1 << 1), &err);
 
  out:
 	DPRINTK("EXIT, classes[0]=%u [1]=%u\n", classes[0], classes[1]);
@@ -3574,7 +3576,7 @@ int sata_std_hardreset(struct ata_link *
 
 	ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 0);	/* probably unnecessary */
 
-	*class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 0, NULL);
+	*class = ata_dev_try_classify(link->device, 1, NULL);
 
 	DPRINTK("EXIT, class=%u\n", *class);
 	return 0;
Index: work/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
+++ work/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
@@ -636,9 +636,11 @@ static int scc_std_softreset (struct ata
 	}
 
 	/* determine by signature whether we have ATA or ATAPI devices */
-	classes[0] = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 0, &err);
+	classes[0] = ata_dev_try_classify(&ap->link.device[0],
+					  devmask & (1 << 0), &err);
 	if (slave_possible && err != 0x81)
-		classes[1] = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 1, &err);
+		classes[1] = ata_dev_try_classify(&ap->link.device[1],
+						  devmask & (1 << 1), &err);
 
  out:
 	DPRINTK("EXIT, classes[0]=%u [1]=%u\n", classes[0], classes[1]);
Index: work/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
+++ work/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
@@ -2224,7 +2224,7 @@ comreset_retry:
 	 */
 
 	/* finally, read device signature from TF registers */
-	*class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 0, NULL);
+	*class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap->link.device, 1, NULL);
 
 	writelfl(0, port_mmio + EDMA_ERR_IRQ_CAUSE_OFS);
 
Index: work/include/linux/libata.h
===================================================================
--- work.orig/include/linux/libata.h
+++ work/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -781,7 +781,8 @@ extern void ata_port_queue_task(struct a
 extern u32 ata_wait_register(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask, u32 val,
 			     unsigned long interval_msec,
 			     unsigned long timeout_msec);
-extern unsigned int ata_dev_try_classify(struct ata_port *, unsigned int, u8 *);
+extern unsigned int ata_dev_try_classify(struct ata_device *dev, int present,
+					 u8 *r_err);
 
 /*
  * Default driver ops implementations

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] libata: assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure
  2007-09-02 14:23   ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] " Tejun Heo
@ 2007-09-02 14:24     ` Tejun Heo
  2007-09-20 21:32     ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments Jeff Garzik
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-09-02 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: linux-ide, Alan Cox, amsden_linux

Certain device which reports diagnostic failure also reports invalid
device signature.  Assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure if reset
indicates device presence.

This is fix for bugzilla bug 8784.

  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8784

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Edward Amsden <amsden_linux@earthlink.net>
---
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c |   18 ++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: work/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ work/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -751,10 +751,20 @@ unsigned int ata_dev_try_classify(struct
 	/* determine if device is ATA or ATAPI */
 	class = ata_dev_classify(&tf);
 
-	if (class == ATA_DEV_UNKNOWN)
-		return ATA_DEV_NONE;
-	if ((class == ATA_DEV_ATA) && (ata_chk_status(ap) == 0))
-		return ATA_DEV_NONE;
+	if (class == ATA_DEV_UNKNOWN) {
+		/* If the device failed diagnostic, it's likely to
+		 * have reported incorrect device signature too.
+		 * Assume ATA device if the device seems present but
+		 * device signature is invalid with diagnostic
+		 * failure.
+		 */
+		if (present && (dev->horkage & ATA_HORKAGE_DIAGNOSTIC))
+			class = ATA_DEV_ATA;
+		else
+			class = ATA_DEV_NONE;
+	} else if ((class == ATA_DEV_ATA) && (ata_chk_status(ap) == 0))
+		class = ATA_DEV_NONE;
+
 	return class;
 }
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments
  2007-09-02 14:23   ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] " Tejun Heo
  2007-09-02 14:24     ` [PATCH 2/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] libata: assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure Tejun Heo
@ 2007-09-20 21:32     ` Jeff Garzik
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2007-09-20 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: linux-ide, Alan Cox, amsden_linux

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Make ata_dev_try_classify() take a pointer to ata_device instead of
> ata_port/port_number combination for consistency and add @present
> argument.  @present indicates whether the device seems present during
> reset.  It's the result of TF access during softreset and link
> onlineness during hardreset.  @present will be used to improve
> diagnostic failure handling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/ata/pata_scc.c    |    6 ++++--
>  drivers/ata/sata_mv.c     |    2 +-
>  include/linux/libata.h    |    3 ++-
>  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

applied 1-2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-20 21:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-08  5:37 [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments Tejun Heo
2007-08-08  5:40 ` [PATCH 2/2 #upstream] libata: assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure Tejun Heo
2007-08-08  8:33   ` Alan Cox
2007-08-31  9:18 ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments Jeff Garzik
2007-09-02 14:23   ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] " Tejun Heo
2007-09-02 14:24     ` [PATCH 2/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] libata: assume ATA_DEV_ATA on diagnostic failure Tejun Heo
2007-09-20 21:32     ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream,REGENERATED] libata: udpate ata_dev_try_classify() arguments Jeff Garzik

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).