From: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Resets on sil3124 & sil3726 PMP
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 02:57:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46DBDA84.3050505@vc.cvut.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46DBCCE9.9080806@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>> For comparsion 1TB Hitachi behind 3726 PMP (again MS4UM) with sata_sil
>> patch I sent last week (no NCQ, 1.5Gbps link between 3512 and PMP, and
>> 3.0Gbps link between PMP and drive... why is it faster?):
>
> If you turn off NCQ by echoing 1 to /sys/block/sdd/device/queue_depth on
> sata_sil24, does the performance change?
I have recompiled kernel with all debugging disabled, and it brought me
1.5MBps, so it is still consistently 1MBps slower than on sil.
Disabling NCQ seems to improve concurrent access a bit (for which I have
no explanation), while slows down single drive scenario:
With NCQ:
1TB alone: 81.22, 79.86
1TB+1TB: 56.28+56.70, 53.51+56.11
Without NCQ:
1TB alone: 79.78, 80.82
1TB+1TB: 57.99+58.12, 56.50+56.46
3512 sil, no NCQ:
1TB alone: 82.28, 82.18
1TB+1TB: 47.20+47.54 # Here apparently command based switching or
1.5Gbps link between device and PMP becomes bottleneck
And it seems that I observe what other poster pointed out - that
apparently all SiI chips are limited somewhere around 120-130MBps, and
cannot do more even if you pretty ask...
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-03 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-27 4:55 Resets on sil3124 & sil3726 PMP Richard Scobie
2007-08-27 7:11 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-03 8:59 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-03 9:57 ` Petr Vandrovec [this message]
2007-09-03 12:50 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-04 1:38 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-05 12:08 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-05 21:30 ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-09-06 9:52 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-09-06 18:02 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-06 17:59 ` Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-03 19:39 Richard Scobie
2007-09-03 20:34 ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-09-03 21:21 ` Richard Scobie
2007-08-27 8:08 Richard Scobie
2007-08-27 22:49 ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-08-15 13:58 Rusty Conover
2007-08-17 18:06 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-20 19:56 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-21 2:42 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-22 3:03 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-22 5:00 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-22 5:43 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-22 6:11 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-22 6:39 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-22 6:56 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-22 7:02 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-22 7:49 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-25 2:19 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-26 16:37 ` Rusty Conover
2007-08-27 1:18 ` Tejun Heo
2007-08-14 23:39 Rusty Conover
2007-08-15 6:10 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46DBDA84.3050505@vc.cvut.cz \
--to=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@sauce.co.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).