From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Resets on sil3124 & sil3726 PMP Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:59:23 +0900 Message-ID: <46E03FFB.8020901@gmail.com> References: <46D2595B.1030409@sauce.co.nz> <46D2792B.401@vc.cvut.cz> <46DBCCE9.9080806@gmail.com> <46DBDA84.3050505@vc.cvut.cz> <46DC030E.9070704@gmail.com> <46DCB709.902@vc.cvut.cz> <46DE9C20.9030007@vc.cvut.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.188]:3690 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754177AbXIFSAs (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2007 14:00:48 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so205196rvb for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:00:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46DE9C20.9030007@vc.cvut.cz> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Petr Vandrovec Cc: Richard Scobie , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Petr Vandrovec wrote: >>> Hmmmm.... Weird. Is the different still there if you take PMP out of >>> the picture? >> >> Will do tomorrow. I need physical access to the box to do that. > > Yes, no difference. 3512 is consistently about 1MBps faster than 3132 > when talking to single Hitachi 1TB drive. Thanks for testing. Don't have much idea why. Maybe it's something inherent to the 3132 hardware. :-( -- tejun