From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4][reRESEND] ahci: RAID mode SATA patch for Intel Tolapai Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 14:51:59 +0900 Message-ID: <46E2387F.4020404@gmail.com> References: <200708302127.19535.jason.d.gaston@intel.com> <46D7C783.8050803@pobox.com> <39B20DF628532344BC7A2692CB6AEE0701B9A4CA@orsmsx420.amr.corp.intel.com> <46E1D313.2060302@pobox.com> <39B20DF628532344BC7A2692CB6AEE0701BCF3B5@orsmsx420.amr.corp.intel.com> <46E1E559.4000702@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.178]:41515 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753536AbXIHRGo (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:06:44 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so939980wah for ; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 10:06:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46E1E559.4000702@pobox.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: "Gaston, Jason D" , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > Gaston, Jason D wrote: >> At this time, I don't have any way to test those particular DeviceID's >> and I know that the AHCI mode DeviceID works by using the class code >> support. So, I would like to just leave them at they are, if that is >> ok. > > > Fine by me... Overall I'll follow "vendor's best advice" here :) The distinction between board_ahci and board_ahci_pi has been removed in #upstream anyway, so it doesn't matter too much anyway. Thanks. -- tejun