* HSM violation on bootup, ICH7 + ata_piix 2.6.22
@ 2007-09-03 10:39 Eamonn Hamilton
2007-09-08 7:52 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eamonn Hamilton @ 2007-09-03 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ide
Hi,
I'm looking ta a Dell SC440 system for a friend, and it's giving HSM
violations at startup.
The system itself has an ICH7 chipset, with two seagate ST3160812AS
drives attached along with a single ST3400832AS, running kernel 2.6.22
and the ata_piix driver.
I'm guessing this isn't good :(
Anybody gt any suggestions?
The violations are :
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd b0/d2:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
123392 in
res 50/00:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd b0/d2:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
123392 in
res 50/00:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd b0/d2:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
123392 in
res 50/00:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd b0/d2:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
123392 in
res 50/00:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd b0/d2:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
123392 in
res 50/00:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd b0/d2:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
123392 in
res 50/00:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd b0/db:f8:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
126976 in
res 50/00:f8:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd b0/db:f8:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
126976 in
res 50/00:f8:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd b0/db:f8:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
126976 in
res 50/00:f8:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd b0/db:f8:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
126976 in
res 50/00:f8:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd b0/db:f8:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
126976 in
res 50/00:f8:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd b0/db:f8:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
126976 in
res 50/00:f8:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
Cheers,
Eamonn
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: HSM violation on bootup, ICH7 + ata_piix 2.6.22
2007-09-03 10:39 HSM violation on bootup, ICH7 + ata_piix 2.6.22 Eamonn Hamilton
@ 2007-09-08 7:52 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-10 8:59 ` Eamonn Hamilton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-09-08 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eamonn Hamilton; +Cc: linux-ide
Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking ta a Dell SC440 system for a friend, and it's giving HSM
> violations at startup.
>
> The system itself has an ICH7 chipset, with two seagate ST3160812AS
> drives attached along with a single ST3400832AS, running kernel 2.6.22
> and the ata_piix driver.
>
> I'm guessing this isn't good :(
>
> Anybody gt any suggestions?
>
> The violations are :
>
>
> ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
> ata1.00: cmd b0/d2:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
> 123392 in
> res 50/00:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
> violation)
Please disable or upgrade smartd.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: HSM violation on bootup, ICH7 + ata_piix 2.6.22
2007-09-08 7:52 ` Tejun Heo
@ 2007-09-10 8:59 ` Eamonn Hamilton
2007-09-13 20:09 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eamonn Hamilton @ 2007-09-10 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: linux-ide
Hi Tejun,
>
> Please disable or upgrade smartd.
>
Thanks for that, I checked the disks and sure enough they were in an
extended self test, I aborted that and it's all back to normal.
the only problem, however, is that the system is already running version
5.37 of the smartmontools package, which is the most recent as I
understand it? I don't really want to leave the system with it's disks
unmonitored, is there anything I can be doing to prevent this behaviour?
Cheers,
Eamonn
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: HSM violation on bootup, ICH7 + ata_piix 2.6.22
2007-09-10 8:59 ` Eamonn Hamilton
@ 2007-09-13 20:09 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-14 13:56 ` Bruce Allen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-09-13 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eamonn Hamilton; +Cc: linux-ide, ballen
Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
> Thanks for that, I checked the disks and sure enough they were in an
> extended self test, I aborted that and it's all back to normal.
>
> the only problem, however, is that the system is already running version
> 5.37 of the smartmontools package, which is the most recent as I
> understand it? I don't really want to leave the system with it's disks
> unmonitored, is there anything I can be doing to prevent this behaviour?
Hmmm... That gotta be a different issue then. Cc'ing Bruce and quoting
the original report.
Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking ta a Dell SC440 system for a friend, and it's giving HSM
> > violations at startup.
> >
> > The system itself has an ICH7 chipset, with two seagate ST3160812AS
> > drives attached along with a single ST3400832AS, running kernel 2.6.22
> > and the ata_piix driver.
> >
> > I'm guessing this isn't good :(
> >
> > Anybody gt any suggestions?
> >
> > The violations are :
> >
> >
> > ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
> > ata1.00: cmd b0/d2:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
> > 123392 in
> > res 50/00:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
> > violation)
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: HSM violation on bootup, ICH7 + ata_piix 2.6.22
2007-09-13 20:09 ` Tejun Heo
@ 2007-09-14 13:56 ` Bruce Allen
2007-09-14 15:09 ` Eamonn Hamilton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Allen @ 2007-09-14 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: Smartmontools Developers List, Smartmontools Mailing List,
linux-ide, Douglas Gilbert, Eamonn Hamilton, Bruce Allen
Tejun: thanks for the CC. I'm clueless about what is at fault here.
Eamonn: could you please build the latest version of smartmontools from
CVS HEAD source and see if the problem exists in that version? Then write
back. I don't think this will help but want to eliminate obvious things.
Cheers,
Bruce
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
>> Thanks for that, I checked the disks and sure enough they were in an
>> extended self test, I aborted that and it's all back to normal.
>>
>> the only problem, however, is that the system is already running version
>> 5.37 of the smartmontools package, which is the most recent as I
>> understand it? I don't really want to leave the system with it's disks
>> unmonitored, is there anything I can be doing to prevent this behaviour?
>
> Hmmm... That gotta be a different issue then. Cc'ing Bruce and quoting
> the original report.
>
> Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm looking ta a Dell SC440 system for a friend, and it's giving HSM
>>> violations at startup.
>>>
>>> The system itself has an ICH7 chipset, with two seagate ST3160812AS
>>> drives attached along with a single ST3400832AS, running kernel 2.6.22
>>> and the ata_piix driver.
>>>
>>> I'm guessing this isn't good :(
>>>
>>> Anybody gt any suggestions?
>>>
>>> The violations are :
>>>
>>>
>>> ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
>>> ata1.00: cmd b0/d2:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
>>> 123392 in
>>> res 50/00:f1:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x202 (HSM
>>> violation)
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: HSM violation on bootup, ICH7 + ata_piix 2.6.22
2007-09-14 13:56 ` Bruce Allen
@ 2007-09-14 15:09 ` Eamonn Hamilton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eamonn Hamilton @ 2007-09-14 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Allen
Cc: Tejun Heo, Bruce Allen, Douglas Gilbert,
Smartmontools Developers List, Smartmontools Mailing List,
linux-ide
OK,
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 08:56 -0500, Bruce Allen wrote:
...
> Eamonn: could you please build the latest version of smartmontools from
> CVS HEAD source and see if the problem exists in that version? Then write
> back. I don't think this will help but want to eliminate obvious things.
>
I built the latest version which reports itself as 5.38 from cvs.
The results, as you suspected, were no different.
The setup :
The system is setup with sda and sdb being partitioned as follows :
/dev/sda1 * 1 243 1951866 fd Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sda2 244 1459 9767520 fd Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sda3 1460 1824 2931862+ fd Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sda4 1825 19452 141596910 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 1825 7295 43945776 fd Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/sda6 7296 19452 97651071 fd Linux raid
autodetect
raid1 mirrors are then setup between the corresponding partitions on the
two disks.
The results :
using either 5.37 or 5.38, issuing a smartctl -t long on either one of
the disk devices allows filesystem access at full speed, and issuing a
smartctl -X on the disk returns inside a second. All is well:
time dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=1k count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1048576 bytes (1.0 MB) copied, 0.00488519 seconds, 215 MB/s
Starting an extended self-test on *both* disks, however, and filesystem
access is *extremely* slow, which may be why the violations are
happening, although I didn't leave it running long enough to impact the
box:
time dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=1k count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1048576 bytes (1.0 MB) copied, 0.00505913 seconds, 207 MB/s
real 0m9.107s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.004s
Now, I'm asking the guy who runs the system as to when I can test the
smartd, but I'm guessing from this that the results will be exactly the
same.
Comments?
Cheers,
Eamonn
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-14 15:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-03 10:39 HSM violation on bootup, ICH7 + ata_piix 2.6.22 Eamonn Hamilton
2007-09-08 7:52 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-10 8:59 ` Eamonn Hamilton
2007-09-13 20:09 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-14 13:56 ` Bruce Allen
2007-09-14 15:09 ` Eamonn Hamilton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).